From personalization to image editing and from managing repetitive tasks to increasing efficiency, Artificial Intelligence can do everything! It is known for improving accuracy and generating art that is mind-stirring.
However, a very important question arises in people’s minds, and today, we are here to address it. The question is, ‘Can automation actually replace human designers?’ The answer is simple. You cannot decide that until you observe both sides.
One side is pro-automation, where we will discuss whether machine intelligence is wise enough to swap places completely with a human. On the contrary, there will be views about the incompetence of artificial intelligence. Then, only you can pick whether to stand against or in favour of the subject.
AI or Human Designers: Who Does It Better? Let’s Dig In
Today’s debate involves two key players: AI and Human Designers. Both of them bring excellent solutions, but the first player advantages are algorithms and data analysis. On the other hand, the other one draws expertise from personal experience, creativity, and emotional intelligence.
For example, you have two options if you want a company profile design. You either let the service providers do their magic, or you use free AI tools to get it made instantly. The results will be like two sides of the same coin – not very far apart. So, let us begin the debate with our first perspective.
Standpoint #1 – Pro-Automation
The term pro-automation shows the favouring side of AI with three arguments supporting robotic technology. It is very beneficial and emphasizes integrating automated tools to improve efficiency. In the meantime, people can concentrate on further multifaceted and innovative aspects of their work. Hence, below are three main benefits that this integration brings us:
Cost Effectiveness
In the era of digitization and increased awareness, is there anyone who desires to waste money? Would anyone with a sane mind would want that to happen? None. Right? Now we know the value of money and aim to be economical.
We know how automatic machines and systems can reduce the cost of hiring labour in the next few years. Moreover, by minimizing the need for a large human workforce, we can save money. All this money can go to a greater cause and profit the business from another stream.
Consistency & Precision
When it comes to computerization in design, we find concepts like CAD – Computer Aided Design and CAM – Computer Aided Manufacturing. These functions boost the precision of many projects, especially in the automotive industry.
Machines excel at producing uniform results and eliminating variability, which is a common sight in man’s work. With a constant chance of human error, the reliability of the project is also affected, such as in company profile writing services. If written by Artificial Intelligence, the draft will be flawless. However, there is a 50/50 chance of losing an investor otherwise.
Enhanced Speed
It is not just the consistent quality; the machine work also enhances efficiency and speed in the design process. This happens because robots can skillfully manage repetitive tasks like resizing images, generating variation or applying filters without any fatigue.
Thus, the completion is always faster and perfect when things are left to the robot or AI alone.
As a result of this rapid execution, not only are the timelines shortened, but it also saves a major chunk of your time. Now, you can devote energy to the conceptualization phase and think of more and more innovative ideas.
Standpoint #2 – Anti-Automation
Anti-automation perspectives aim to emphasize the importance of maintaining human involvement in many industries because creativity and human skills are irreplaceable. These elements are known for preserving innovation and quality in the companies. Hence, advocates debate for a balanced approach where technology supports instead of replacing the efforts of a man. Here are three arguments, which they provide:
Socially Devastating
Artificial versus Man’s Intelligence has been an ongoing debate for the last few years. Some people argue that computerization in designing could lead to significant job losses, causing a social disorder, as the exclusive upsides of man’s intelligence are also difficult to overlook.
They bring cultural nuances to their work, which are not a robot’s piece of cake. A machine cannot fill the void of diversity in design, which only man can bring. Consequently, because of labour displacement, social instability will increase, and the economy will suffer.
Zero Emotional Touch
Robots, being machines, can have brainpower like men, but no amount of science can ever infuse emotions and empathy into them. It is emotional intelligence – the gift of God, which robots can never imitate even after years of machine learning.
This built-in feature of humankind separates us from computers and helps us make emotionally sterile designs.
Moreover, if you try to make an app or a product without the human touch, it will not be able to resonate with users on a deeper level. This means that, with a lack of emotional depth, the product might feel impersonal.
Less or No Flexibility
Flexibility in designers is grave. It allows them to adapt to new trends, solve problems creatively and innovate beyond rigid automated systems. However, computers are barely flexible.
The coder can feed some codes, but still, the machines depend on codes and cannot make instant decisions to suit the situation as a man would. This rigidity can suffocate the already thin chances of innovation, and the designs that are produced will be standard and unoriginal.
Apart from the inability to make informed and nuanced decisions, robots also cannot think creatively and think through cultural aspects as effectively as humans do.
Q. Is it possible to substitute the UX design jobs with AI?
Artificial intelligence is helpful in some UX design tasks, but it lacks the human touch, empathy and creativity which is necessary to drive effective designs. Therefore, it is next to impossible.
Q. How many jobs can automation affect altogether?
It can threaten millions of jobs globally and affect several industries, but studies show that Artificial Intelligence has the potential to create up to 30% of jobs. However, it can differ based on technology adoption and workforce adaptability.
Q. Is this replacement of humans in businesses ethical?
The ethical consideration depends on the context. If we only look at the cost savings, increased efficiency and growth side, then job losses might not be unethical. However, dehumanizing the workplace without caring about their rights is unethical.
Q. Will automation destroy more jobs than it creates?
The estimates, given by the World Economic Forum (WEF) in 2020 for 2025 say that in these five years, 12 million more jobs will be created than destroyed. Perhaps automation may not be that bad.
The Synergy is The Only Correct Answer!
Coming back to our question – ‘Can Automation Actually Replace Human Designers?’ After observing both sides, the answer is right here in front of us, and it is Synergy.
Synergy is a sum of two or more phenomena. It means that when groups come together, the combined effect is greater than the sum of its parts. Therefore, we think people should work with systems to achieve more than they were when they were independent.
As an outcome, creativity enhances, efficiency soars, and innovation recognizes no boundaries. Data handling and repetitive tasks are AI’s responsibility, whereas the emotional intelligence department would remain under the supervision of humans. This adds up to be an aesthetically pleasing but functional relationship!
